User talk:Romanm
Welcome
[edit]Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.
You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)
Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.
Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.
You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.
If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
- If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
- You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
- If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 14:30, 9 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Hi there. I noticed that you put a link in Republic of Macedonia to sl:Makedonija which currently has no text. Interwiki links should only be put in to existing articles because otherwise it confuses users. You could put the link and comment it out if you think that's where the article will eventually be. Dori | Talk 21:18, Feb 12, 2004 (UTC)
- Hello, Dori! I edited two pages at the same time, but commited the English version first. Now it should be OK, sorry for the confusion. --Romanm 21:31, 12 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Hi, Can you add the romanization of the Chinese titles in the list of Harry Potter book titles in Translation? It should be Chinese (traditional): Romanization (Chinese, "literal meaning"). Thanks Exploding Boy 14:14, Mar 21, 2004 (UTC)
Ex-Yugoslavia
[edit]Thanks for helping out with disambiguating links to Yugoslavias. I've done two sweeps so far but it only made a small dent on the total link count.
Having said that, are you sure that linking Former Yugoslavia to just one of them is the proper way? I'd rather if we changed links that link to there to be precise... --Shallot 22:53, 27 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Yes, I agree with you. I think that an average English speaking person by Former Yugoslavia really means Former SFRY. But I agree that the links should be corrected to be precise. --Romanm 23:04, 27 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Coat of Arms and other images
[edit]Hi Roman,
I see you're having a hard time to educate Avala on copyright issues. So do I. I went through all his image uploads and posted quite a lot of them on Copyright problems. (At least I think I got them all.) I did not post any Coat of Arms there, and, for the time being, I also refrained from posting images that were not clearly copyrighted. I think, these will have to be posted some day, too, but for now I just don't feel like doing this: it might put the user off completely because then I needed to post virtually all his uploads there.
Apparently, Avala has a "copy and see if I get away with it" attitude regarding images. He doesn't understand that no copyright notice doesn't mean "public domain", and he's very negligient in looking for copyright statements in the first place.
As to the Coat of Arms: I do not know what Serbian law says on that issue. It may be that Avala is even right, and CoAs cannot be protected in Serbia... The question remains, of course, whether a drawing of a CoA is original art and as such copyrightable.
Lupo 15:26, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Location maps
[edit]Thanks for your comment on my maps. I had originally made some maps for the three countries you mentioned, but I didn't upload them at the time. I've just done that now - here, here, and here. I hope those are adequate - I can see a number of ways to improve them, but if you think that these are okay, I'll leave them for now. -- Vardion 06:56, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Hi - I somehow forgot all about Montserrat, sorry. I've uploaded it now: Image:LocationMontserrat.png. I hope that's satisfactory - the island's a bit small, so it's hard to show on a map without making the scale to small. -- Vardion 05:24, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
I didn't have any maps for Åland or Guam, but it was easy enough to make some with what I already had. They're uploaded at Image:LocationAland.png and Image:LocationGuam.png. -- Vardion 14:41, 13 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Maps for Svalbard, the Caymans, and the two Virgin Islands groups are now available: image:LocationSvalbard.png, image:LocationCaymanIslands.png, image:LocationUSVirginIslands.png, and image:LocationBritishVirginIslands.png. I hope they're satisfactory. As for Armenia, I don't really remember much about what I thought when creating it. I'm somewhat unclear about the political situation with some of those enclaves. Does this new version, image:LocationArmenia.png look closer to what's at Geography of Armenia? -- Vardion 05:41, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Maps for the five places you requested are now done: Image:LocationGibraltar.png, Image:LocationFaroeIslands.png, Image:LocationNetherlandsAntilles.png, Image:LocationTokelau.png, and Image:LocationAnguilla.png. I also fixed the Azerbaijan map as you suggested. Sorry it took so long to do these - for a while, I didn't have access to the particular files I needed. I hope these are satisfactory. -- Vardion 06:51, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Adminship?
[edit]You have done a lot of great work to Wikipedia recently. I would like to nominate you for adminship. Do you accept the nomination? --Lst27 23:37, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Austria-Hungary blank map
[edit]I'm glad you liked my map. I've made a blank version and it's here. --Kpalion 00:22, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Vandalism?
[edit]Hi, are you aware of Wikipedia:Vandalism in progress#Romanm. I'm not involved in those articles so I don't know if the complaints against you are substantiated, but I think you should at least respond to them there. Thanks. Angela. 15:57, May 2, 2004 (UTC)
HURRY UP
[edit]Check out this Slovenian websites news that you missed! Hurry up because it is in cache.
Why did you oppose yourself?
[edit]You voted on the Wikipedia:Requests for adminship page to oppose yourself. Did you think about it before doing it?
Romanm, I got your message. I understand how you feel, and I think I can nominate you again sometime in June. --Lst27 21:17, 10 May 2004 (UTC)
Avala
[edit]I've just made a RfC page about User:Avala. Since you've been involved in trying to smooth out these disputes with Avala, you might want to go certify it. Snowspinner 19:08, 20 May 2004 (UTC)
RfA
[edit]I've recently been nominated for administrator status over at RfA. Since you're more familiar than most users with my work on Wikipedia, particularly through the conflict with Avala (Which seems particularly relevent to any admin nomination), I thought you might want to offer an opinion on the matter. I'd appreciate any vote you can offer, either for or against the nomination. Thanks very much. Snowspinner 14:19, Jun 2, 2004 (UTC)
More Location maps
[edit]My apologies about the huge delay in responding - I completely forgot about your message. I'm very sorry about that. I've uploaded Image:LocationAmericanSamoa.png, Image:LocationJersey.png, Image:LocationHongKong.png, Image:LocationMacau.png, Image:LocationSaintHelena.png, and Image:LocationFalklandIslands.png - I hope they're satisfactory. Since you asked for one of Jersey, I also made one for Guernsey at the same time (Image:LocationGuernsey.png) - I don't know whether this is useful or not, but I thought I might as well make it anyway. -- Vardion 09:32, 10 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Reason for amending the Irish flag
[edit]I'm curious as to why you amended the Irish flag image. The flag is Green, White and Orange, the CIA factbook version you put up is incorrect, being the misconception of Green, White and Gold. This is a myth of confused people not understanding the symbolism of the Irish flag. It makes no sense for example for a Republican to object to Orange on the flag, as the whole reason for including Orange was to have a flag for a united Ireland. Zoney 23:45, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
coat of arms
[edit]I saw that your friend contributed with adding communist emblems of former Yugoslavia. Because Serbia is still using old coat of arms it would be nice to upolad that coat of arms too.
[[User:Avala|Avala|★]] 16:52, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
did he draw it yet? --[[User:Avala|Avala|★]] 10:05, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
reverting
[edit]Please don`t revert images of COAs because colours were wrong in some of them. I changed. You seem to revert every edit of mine whether it is good or not.
[[User:Avala|Avala|★]] 12:57, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
I changed colours according to encyclopedia.--[[User:Avala|Avala|★]] 12:58, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Borza lesa
[edit]We have a Borza lesa page on Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English which, we suspect, may be in Slovenian. Could you have a look at it (whether it is Slovenian and, if so, whether it is worth translating)? Andris 16:08, Aug 9, 2004 (UTC)
Avala's case at the Arbcom
[edit]Could you visit Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Avala/Evidence#Snowspinner.27s and tell what is the correct translation of several terms directed at Avala? Nikola 19:49, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Thank you :) Nikola 22:09, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Georgia maps
[edit]Nice maps - well done! -- ChrisO 23:34, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- I did not make the Georgia district maps myself, I found them on the Estonian Wikipedia where they were uploaded by Urmas. I did, however, realize that they are valuable and include them in articles here, so thanks for the praise anyway.
--romanm (talk) 23:41, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)
balkan bacchanalia :)
[edit]There's now a meta:South Slavic NPOV page. I know you edited various pages about Yugoslavia so you may be interested in this. --Joy [shallot] 12:41, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Small images
[edit]At Image:Belgium_flag_large.png, an image I recently cleaned up, you somehow reduced the previous version to a startlingly small 500 bytes. No combination of tools I could muster could reproduce this. Can I ask how you achieved such a tiny size? Derrick Coetzee 01:50, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Arbitration matter of Avala is closed
[edit]1) The above findings of fact show that Avala has often worked against consensus and majority opinion. We therefore rule that Avala must follow the majority opinion of the users involved concerning any controversial edits that Avala makes. One specific consequence is that violations of the three revert rule are not permitted. This probation period will last for one month.
2) For a period of 3 months, should a serious dispute arise between Avala and other users with respect to editing of an article Avala is required to cite substantial authority supporting the position he is taking and either enter the dispute resolution process regarding the matter or drop the matter. A serious dispute is defined as one in which any party to the dispute has reverted the other 3 times or more. After Avala makes his third revert he shall cease editing the article with respect to the disputed matter until completion of the dispute resolution process. Resolution of the dispute in his favor shall require verification that the authority cited adequately supports the information he advocates including in the article. With respect to matters of taste such as size of templates he is required to defer to majority opinion.
3) Given the fact that Avala is now editing at a low rate, we reserve the right to revisit the conduct issue of this user once/if Avala starts to edit at an increased rate again and other users complain about Avala's conduct. This probation would last one year.
For principles, findings of fact, and enforcement see Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Avala#Final decision. --mav 21:48, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Article Licensing
[edit]Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
- Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
- Multi-Licensing Guide
- Free the Rambot Articles Project
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
- Option 1
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
OR
- Option 2
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk) 19:33, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)
Image:Ptuj-grb.png
[edit]Hi! Thanks for uploading Image:Ptuj-grb.png. I noticed it didn't have an image copyright tag. I added {{unknown}} for now. Could you add the correct tag to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the image and I'll tag it for you. Thanks so much, Dbenbenn 00:12, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Geo-stubs
[edit]Hi Romanm! Good to see you've been adding a few more regional geo-stubs. I've gone through and put some more places into those categories from the general Category:Geography stubs. I noticed one geo-stub that should have a BiH-geo-stub label, but I daren't edit it myself. I know from complaints I've had from croatian and Icelandic Wikipedians that my browser can't handle diacritical marks properly, and the article Orahov Do has several of them. Can you change it to a BiH-geo-stub, please? Thanks :) Grutness|hello? 
23:38, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- ...and Czechia this time! Which means a couple more I can't add in - Dowry town (which should have both Czechia-geo-stub and geo-term-stub) and [[Vysoké M<breve>to]] (hm. Can't even type that properly here! - you can get to it from [3] though). Thanks again! Romania probably needs a category now... Grutness|hello?
00:07, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC) PS - I hope you're remembering to add the new categories to the list at Wikipedia:Template_messages/Stubs/By_region!
Slovenian/Slovene
[edit]Hi, Roman. With regards to the Slovenian/Slovene issue, please refer to this discussion. To be brief, Nohat, a Wikipedia arbitrator had this to say before he cleaned up much of the big mess user XJam helped cause:
The reality is that "Slovenian" is is preferred in all English-speaking countries other than Britain. Including Ireland.
I haven't seen any examples yet of Slovenian organizations using "Slovene", and if there are, how many of them are not somehow British and how many of them are referring in particular to the language? Certainly "The Fran Ramovš Institute Of Slovenian Language", publishers of Slovenian dictionaries and grammars, use "Slovenian" in reference to the language. Second, the argument that it is scarcely relevant that the official website of SAZU calls itself "Slovenian" is ridiculous. It's the official web site, and it's in English! And it says "Slovenian"! Just because it's contrary to your preferred usage doesn't make it irrelevant.
The primary goal of Wikipedia is to provide as much information to as many people as possible, and insisting on using a rare regionalism over an internationally-accepted form is contrary to that goal. If you ask any reasonable Wikipedian, you will find that they will all agree that if the goal of providing accessible information conflicts with the supposed "goal" of keeping spelling diverse, then we should err on the side of accessibility rather than diverse spelling.
And finally, regardless of who originally wrote the article, you are the only one who is insisting on calling it "Slovene", contrary to the vast majority of international English usage.
Slovene is a completely unnatural and awkward sounding term for a country that ends in -ia. In addition, Roman, virtually no native-English speaking Slovenian uses the term Slovene! Even in the England, Slovene is becoming archaic. The Euroleague, UEFA, and the Olympics all use Slovenian exclusively. And many English newspapers (and even Eurosport, surely you've noticed this) use Slovenian more often than not.
This is a unique period where we (Slovenians) have an opportunity to solidify the already dominant and preferred term as the 'one' others will refer to us as forevermore. I would like to add that it is a real shame a few users, like XJam, are so narrowminded and audacious that they think what *they* know what sounds better in a foreign language than native speakers. There is a 'reason' the vast majority of native-English speaking Slovenians use strictly Slovenian. And there is reason the Slovenian Chamber of Commerce and most international Slovenian companies use strictly Slovenian, as well. -BT
Dragan Kojadinovic
[edit]Thanks for the information (I'd guessed that it was Belgrade, but I didn't want to add that until I was sure). About my second question: do you know if he campaigned to be elected mayor of Belgrade, or for someone else, or what? Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 15:51, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Canada Map
[edit]Thanks for the comment regarding the map. It looks pretty complete to me. You said it looks like it's been cut in half...what part looks cut off to you? --ScottyBoy900Q∞ 00:23, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Diacritics
[edit]As you know, 'š' and 's' are completely different letters in Slovenian. For this reason, the diacritic warning on Janez Janša's page is not correct and should be removed. -BT
- I agree. Is there any other foreign characters warning we could use? --romanm (talk) 18:51, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
None of which I'm aware of. Are you sure we need one? To me, the warning at the top is an eyesore. I don't think such a warning needs to be one first things a visitor sees. At any rate, here is Janša's French page: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janez_Jan%C5%A1a. The only immediate problem I see is that if someone types into the search engine "Janez Jansa" nothing turns up. To fix this (on the French wiki), when I have time, I will create a "Janez Jansa" link that forwards to the "Janez_Jan%C5%A1a" page. -BT
Morphogenesis - Alan Turing
[edit]I noticed your removal of the link to Alan Turing on Morphogenesis. I do believe Alan Turing had a role in the ideas behind Morphogenesis. It might be a good idea to discuss this with the original contributor and amplify the contributions rather than to remove it.
Shyamal 05:42, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- True, my mistake. I thought that this sentence from Alan Turing does not say much about Morphogenesis beside Turings interests in it:
- Turing worked from 1952 until his death in 1954 on mathematical biology, specifically morphogenesis. He published one paper on the subject called "The Chemical Basis of Morphogenesis" in 1952. His central interest in the field was understanding Fibonacci phyllotaxis, the existence of Fibonacci numbers in plant structures. He used reaction-diffusion equations which are now central to the field of pattern formation. Later papers went unpublished until 1992 when Collected Works of A.M. Turing was published.
- IMHO, if Turing's work is indeed important in that field, this should be described in the Morphogenesis article - listing Turing in the "see also" section is not enough. I did leave a note to the original contributor on his talk page, though. --romanm (talk) 11:30, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Hamster image
[edit]
I removed the GFDL logo. Sorry for the inconvenience. --Acela Express 04:46, May 29, 2005 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | Image:SFRY_flag_large.png has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion. |
Zscout370 (Sound Off) 20:31, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | Image:SR_Macedonia_flag_large.png has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion. |
Zscout370 (Sound Off) 20:35, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
lots of edits, not an admin
[edit]Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. If you're at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in this list? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list, although there is certainly no guarantee anyone will ever look at it. Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 00:27, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
and other images at the top of [4] - any possibility of you specifying a licence for these, like PD or GFDL. Are they on another language wikipedia? Can you give me the link. Thanks --Tagishsimon (talk)
- Those are the pictures that were created and uploaded to Slovene Wikipedia by Plp. I tried to contact Plp more than once to clarify the license information, but he seems to be unreachable. IMHO he would have no objection to put it in the PD or license them under GFDL (such was the spirit of our discussions when he was on-line), but I cannot be sure, so I did not mark the license. --romanm (talk) 8 July 2005 11:17 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | Image:Uzbekistan flag large.png has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion. |
Zscout370 (Sound Off) 06:43, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
Uploading to Commons
[edit]I've uploaded the sundial and egg pictures to Commons; sorry it took me so long but I just returned from thrre weeks in Japan on the 28th and was unaware of the request until then. If there are problems with my uploading or whatever, please tell me, as I don't normally use the commons and am not sure that I did it properly. Thanx! Sputnikcccp 23:50, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
Copyright status on Image:Obcine litija.png?
[edit]
Did you make this image? If so could you release it under the GFDL or put it in the public domain as soon as possible, before the evil speedy deletion guys come around and delete this, regardless of whether or not it is useful? Thank you. --Bash 03:31, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- Thank you for notifying me. I am not the author, sl:Uporabnik:Plp is and (s)he cannot be contacted (tried several times) - I only transfered the picture from Slovene Wikipedia. I don't mind if it gets deleted, since there's already a new version on commons:Image:Karte Litija si.png. Thanks again. --romanm (talk) 22:16, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
Thermal power station
[edit]Glad to inform you that I have worked on some Czechoslavikan Steam turbines and boilers in India of capaities upto 500 KW. They are found to be very sturdy.
I do not see following external links in the above article. Please check.
If it is worth translating the above artcle to European languages, I shall be very much pleased as it helps the other readeres as well. Please opine and see what you can do to help others.
--Dore chakravarty 20:06, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
Thermal power station
[edit]Thanks for editing, making me acquaint with Wiki practices, on my first article. The words there in the article (except for spell mistakes) were based on the relevant documents given to us by suppliers at that time and based on my memory only today. Some words, as indicated below, are not at all seen in my early days of working.
1.5 kgf/cm²
— what does this mean?
Shall go through in detail shortly to digest myself of the present practices and contact you if in doubt.
--Dore chakravarty 01:35, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
Test
[edit]Test. --romanm (talk) 21:49, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
Condenser-steam turbine
[edit]If it is worth translating the above artcle to European languages, I shall be very much pleased as it helps the other readeres as well. Please opine and see what you can do to help others. You can also help with any corrections needed.
--Dore chakravarty 21:18, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I do not know enough about energetics to be able to tell whether Condenser (steam turbine) is a good article or not. Sorry. Perhaps you can list it among the Pages needing attention? --romanm (talk) 21:30, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Condenser-steam turbine
[edit]Thanks a lot for the information. Shall think over. What about the translation to other European languages? If not you somebody else.
--Dore chakravarty 23:30, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
United Slovenia
[edit]I was just searching for information on Slovenia because my wife and I are planning to travel there in September or October. Thanks for being a very thorough source of history for me!
Jmcnally 04:23, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
Vinko Bogataj
[edit]Thank you for your edits to Vinko Bogataj. I'm a bit confused because I wrote that page initially, and I've found that I'm no longer listed on the history of that article. I don't mind not being listed, but would you happen to know how that happened? - Scooter 06:59, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
Greetings, editor! Your name appears on Wikipedia:List of non-admins with high edit counts. If you have not done so lately, please take a look at that page and check your listing to be sure that following the particulars are correct:
- If you are an admin, please remove your name from the list.
- If you are currently interested in being considered for adminship, please be sure your name is in bold; if you are opposed to being considered for adminship, please cross out your name (but do not delete it, as it will automatically be re-added in the next page update).
- Please check to see if you are in the right category for classification by number of edits.
Thank you, and have a wiki wiki day! BD2412 T 04:41, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
False Friends of the Slavist
[edit]Please have a look at wikibooks:False Friends of the Slavist. With your language skills, you can help us very much there, though there is not too much to be done. See also wikibooks:Talk:False Friends of the Slavist for details on what is still needed. Thanks in advance! --Daniel Bunčić 18:29, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
H v. Karajan
[edit]They were all mixed up in the old KUK Austro-Hung. Empire weren't they? According to Karl-Markus Gauß he was really a Vlach/Aromanian see articleif you understand a bit of Hungarian . The article was originally published in the Austrian paper Der Standard
see also Hungarian Wikipedia article Abject 11:45, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
Tone's RfA thanks
[edit]Logo for Slovene Wikisource
[edit]Hello! Could you, please, make a version of your Wikisource logo with Slovene text "Wikivir" instead of "Wikisource", so that we could use it on our Wikivir? --romanm (talk) 04:21, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, of course. I'll try to get this to you by Friday. -- Zanimum 18:56, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
Infobox
[edit]Hello Roman! If you have time, could you add a Template:Urban municipality of Slovenia infobox (with census data) for Celje? Olessi 09:34, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- OK, here you are. --romanm (talk) 15:20, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you! Olessi 18:20, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Hello! A while ago you signed up to help translate articles from other Wikipedias at Wikipedia:Translators available.
This page has since become obsolete and has been replaced by two userbox templates.
If you are still interested in translating, you may sign up again by using one of the following userboxes on your userpage (while changing, of course, the codes according to the languages you speak):
{{Translator|es|Spanish}}
{{Proofreader|fr|French}}
We hope to see you soon on Wikipedia:Translation!
The Chain Barnstar of Recognition
[edit]
|
The Chain Barnstar of Recognition | |
| For making a difference! This Barnstar isn't free, this is a chain barnstar, as payment please give this star to at least 3-5 others with 500+ edits but no barnstar. So that everyone who deserves one will get one. Hpfan9374 01:25, 19 August 2007 (UTC) |
The Chain Barnstar of Merit
[edit]
|
The Chain Barnstar of Merit | |
| For your hard work! This Barnstar isn't free, this is a chain barnstar, as payment please give this star to at least 4 others with 1500+ edits but no barnstar or has few barnstars. So that everyone who deserves one will get one. Hpfan9374 01:25, 19 August 2007 (UTC) |
The Chain Barnstar of Diligence
[edit]
|
The Chain Barnstar of Diligence | |
| For shaping Wikipedia! This Barnstar isn't free, this is a chain barnstar, as payment please give this star to at least 3 others with 2500+ edits but no barnstar or has few barnstars. So that everyone who deserves one will get one. Hpfan9374 01:25, 19 August 2007 (UTC) |
The Wikipedian's Chain Barnstar of Honour
[edit]
|
The Wikipedian's Chain Barnstar of Honour | |
| For building Wikipedia! This Barnstar isn't free, this is a chain barnstar, as payment please give this star to at least 2 others with 5000+ edits but no barnstar or has few barnstars. So that everyone who deserves one will get one. Hpfan9374 01:25, 19 August 2007 (UTC) |
AfD nomination of Aljažev stolp
[edit]
An article that you have been involved in editing, Aljažev stolp, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aljažev stolp. Thank you. Sawblade05 (talk to me | my wiki life) 08:02, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Slovenia
[edit]Hi there! You are welcome to join WikiProject Slovenia . We need as many Slovene members as possible!!
♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 21:49, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I'd like to invite all interested parties to participate in the RfC on how should the birth place of the Slovene hockey player Anže Kopitar be stated. Currently it says "born in Jesenice, Yugoslavia, now Slovenia". I think this is unclear and should be rectified. It makes it seem like Jesenice was previously not part of Slovenia or like Slovenia did not exist at that time, nothing of which makes sense. The phrasing "born in Jesenice, Slovenia, Yugoslavia" leaves no doubt. --Eleassar my talk 08:30, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Uporabnik:Romanm/Testpage
[edit]
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Deadly∀ssassin 13:25, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Obsolete image requested for deletion
[edit]File:lifebook.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:lifebook.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 62.245.250.154 (talk) 13:43, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer
[edit]
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:41, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Lifebook.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Lifebook.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:17, 23 June 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Anrie (talk) 20:17, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
- I took this photo myself, thank you for letting me know that there is a problem. BTW, the policy of deleting such images after 48 hours is nonsense - if, by any chance, I hadn't log in to the Wikipedia for two days, my image would have been deleted. --romanm (talk) 20:59, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
WikiProject Slovenia invite
[edit]
|
| Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's Slovenia-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Slovenia? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's Slovenia-related content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. Please see our list of open tasks for ideas on where to get started.
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! Eleassar my talk 10:26, 3 September 2010 (UTC) |
File:SFRY medium coa.png listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SFRY medium coa.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 10:41, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
I moved one of your old maps between these two, feel free to check. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 12:07, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
I changed it to a redirect as that makes more sense and the DAB's are basically there already. Wgolf (talk) 02:57, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
- OK, I agree. --romanm (talk) 06:47, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Article upgrade assistance request (Pre-translation stage)
[edit]Seasons Greetings,
This is in reference to a relatively new umbrella article on en-wikipedia named Ceremonial pole. Ceremonial pole is a human tradition since ancient times; either existed in past at some point of time, or still exists in some cultures across global continents from north to south & from east to west. Ceremonial poles are used to symbolize a variety of concepts in several different world cultures.
Through article Ceremonial pole we intend to take encyclopedic note of cultural aspects and festive celebrations around Ceremonial pole as an umbrella article and want to have historical, mythological, anthropological aspects, reverence or worships wherever concerned as a small part.
While Ceremonial poles have a long past and strong presence but usually less discussed subject. Even before we seek translation of this article in global languages, we need to have more encyclopedic information/input about Ceremonial poles from all global cultures and languages. And we seek your assistance in the same.
Since other contributors to the article are insisting for reliable sources and Standard native english; If your contributions get deleted (for some reason like linguistics or may be your information is reliable but unfortunately dosent match expectations of other editors) , please do list the same on Talk:Ceremonial pole page so that other wikipedians may help improve by interlanguage collaborations, and/or some other language wikipedias may be interested in giving more importance to reliablity of information over other factors on their respective wikipedia.
This particular request is being made to you since your user name is listed in Wikipedia:Translators available list.
Thanking you with warm regards Mahitgar (talk) 06:03, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Romanm. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Romanm. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Romanm. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Select Survey Invite
[edit]I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take no more than 1-2 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.
Your survey Link: https://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_d0eQdxDsA6BNQAl&Q_CHL=gl
I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.
Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 12:39, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Romanm. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Speedy deletion nomination of VIW
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on VIW requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
- disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
- disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
- is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:22, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hello, Alexandermcnabb! There is no "Contest this speedy deletion" on the VIW page. I for one still think that this disambiguation page is useful, but I don't really care, go ahead if you think that Wikipedia will be better without this page. --romanm (talk) 18:28, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hello, I saw your updates on 2022 boycott of Russia and Belarus. Please see talk - We are trying to get a consensus how to merge all Corporate responses into a single page with Corporate responses to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Would be great if you add any new content on Corporate responses to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine.
Thanks, DmitryShpak (talk) 05:18, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)