Jump to content

Talk:The Rape of Nanking (book)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleThe Rape of Nanking (book) has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 31, 2007Good article nomineeListed
August 28, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
September 3, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 18, 2007Good article reassessmentKept
January 3, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
June 28, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

Earlier English-language book(s) on Nanjing Massacre?

[edit]
"When [Iris Chang] searched the local public libraries in her school and found nothing, she wondered why no one had written a book about it."

Why doesn't this article mention Harold John Timperley's What War Means: The Japanese Terror in China (1938)? Chang's own book refers to it. Muzilon (talk) 05:33, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on The Rape of Nanking (book). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:32, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quote in lead

[edit]

@LilAhok per WP:MOSLEAD and MOS:QUOTE the quote doesn't belong in the lead. It has nothing to do with the book itself either, this is an article about a book not an article on the rape of Nanking. Traumnovelle (talk) 02:26, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vocabulary in Lede

[edit]

There is a disagreement in about the use of "perceived" in the lede. The word is dismissive and isn't used by the author or mentioned anywhere else in the article.

[1]

The same user used the same word in another article about the massacre. Pattern suggests it was a random, quick edit in the lead. [2]— Preceding unsigned comment added by LilAhok (talkcontribs) 08:20, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is the source for the Japanese having an ignorance of the event? Traumnovelle (talk) 08:23, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]