Jump to content

Trans-Neptunian object

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Trans-Neptunian Object)

This article is about solar system objects beyond Neptune. For hypothetical planets, see Planets beyond Neptune.
Types of distant minor planets

A trans-Neptunian object (TNO), also written transneptunian object,[1] is any minor planet in the Solar System that orbits the Sun at a greater average distance than Neptune, which has an orbital semi-major axis of 30.1 astronomical units (AU).

Typically, TNOs are further divided into the classical and resonant objects of the Kuiper belt, the scattered disc and detached objects with the sednoids being the most distant ones.[nb 1] As of July 2024, the catalog of minor planets contains 901 numbered and more than 3,000 unnumbered TNOs.[3][4][5][6][7] however, nearly 5000 objects with semimajor axis over 30 AU are present in the MPC catalog, with 1000 being numbered.

The first trans-Neptunian object to be discovered was Pluto in 1930. It took until 1992 to discover a second trans-Neptunian object orbiting the Sun directly, 15760 Albion. The most massive TNO known is Eris, followed by Pluto, Haumea, Makemake, and Gonggong. More than 80 satellites have been discovered in orbit of trans-Neptunian objects. TNOs vary in color and are either grey-blue (BB) or very red (RR). They are thought to be composed of mixtures of rock, amorphous carbon and volatile ices such as water and methane, coated with tholins and other organic compounds.

Twelve minor planets with a semi-major axis greater than 150 AU and perihelion greater than 30 AU are known, which are called extreme trans-Neptunian objects (ETNOs).[8]

History

[edit]

Discovery of Pluto

[edit]
Pluto imaged by New Horizons

The orbit of each of the planets is slightly affected by the gravitational influences of the other planets. Discrepancies in the early 1900s between the observed and expected orbits of Uranus and Neptune suggested that there were one or more additional planets beyond Neptune. The search for these led to the discovery of Pluto in February 1930, which was too small to explain the discrepancies. Revised estimates of Neptune's mass from the Voyager 2 flyby in 1989 showed that the problem was spurious.[9] Pluto was easiest to find because it has the highest apparent magnitude of all known trans-Neptunian objects. It also has a lower inclination to the ecliptic than most other large TNOs.

Subsequent discoveries

[edit]

After Pluto's discovery, American astronomer Clyde Tombaugh continued searching for some years for similar objects but found none. For a long time, no one searched for other TNOs as it was generally believed that Pluto, which up to August 2006 was classified as a planet, was the only major object beyond Neptune. Only after the 1992 discovery of a second TNO, 15760 Albion, did systematic searches for further such objects begin. A broad strip of the sky around the ecliptic was photographed and digitally evaluated for slowly moving objects. Hundreds of TNOs were found, with diameters in the range of 50 to 2,500 kilometers. Eris, the most massive TNO, was discovered in 2005, revisiting a long-running dispute within the scientific community over the classification of large TNOs, and whether objects like Pluto can be considered planets. Pluto and Eris were eventually classified as dwarf planets by the International Astronomical Union.

Classification

[edit]
Distribution of trans-Neptunian objects
Euler diagram showing the types of bodies in the Solar System.

According to their distance from the Sun and their orbital parameters, TNOs are classified in two large groups: the Kuiper belt objects (KBOs) and the scattered disc objects (SDOs).[nb 1] The diagram to the right illustrates the distribution of known trans-Neptunian objects (up to 70 au) in relation to the orbits of the planets and the centaurs for reference. Different classes are represented in different colours. Resonant objects (including Neptune trojans) are plotted in red, classical Kuiper belt objects in blue. The scattered disc extends to the right, far beyond the diagram, with known objects at mean distances beyond 500 au (Sedna) and aphelia beyond 1,000  ((87269) 2000 OO67).

KBOs

[edit]

The Edgeworth–Kuiper belt contains objects with an average distance to the Sun of 30 to about 55 au, usually having close-to-circular orbits with a small inclination from the ecliptic. Edgeworth–Kuiper belt objects are further classified into the resonant trans-Neptunian object that are locked in an orbital resonance with Neptune, and the classical Kuiper belt objects, also called "cubewanos", that have no such resonance, moving on almost circular orbits, unperturbed by Neptune. There are a large number of resonant subgroups, the largest being the twotinos (1:2 resonance) and the plutinos (2:3 resonance), named after their most prominent member, Pluto. Members of the classical Edgeworth–Kuiper belt include 15760 Albion, Quaoar and Makemake.

Another subclass of Kuiper belt objects is the so-called scattering objects (SO). These are non-resonant objects that come near enough to Neptune to have their orbits changed from time to time (such as causing changes in semi-major axis of at least 1.5 AU in 10 million years) and are thus undergoing gravitational scattering. Scattering objects are easier to detect than other trans-Neptunian objects of the same size because they come nearer to Earth, some having perihelia around 20 AU. Several are known with g-band absolute magnitude below 9, meaning that the estimated diameter is more than 100 km. It is estimated that there are between 240,000 and 830,000 scattering objects bigger than r-band absolute magnitude 12, corresponding to diameters greater than about 18 km. Scattering objects are hypothesized to be the source of the so-called Jupiter-family comets (JFCs), which have periods of less than 20 years.[10][11][12]

SDOs

[edit]

The scattered disc contains objects farther from the Sun, with very eccentric and inclined orbits. These orbits are non-resonant and non-planetary-orbit-crossing. A typical example is the most-massive-known TNO, Eris. Based on the Tisserand parameter relative to Neptune (TN), the objects in the scattered disc can be further divided into the "typical" scattered disc objects (SDOs, Scattered-near) with a TN of less than 3, and into the detached objects (ESDOs, Scattered-extended) with a TN greater than 3. In addition, detached objects have a time-averaged eccentricity greater than 0.2[13] The Sednoids are a further extreme sub-grouping of the detached objects with perihelia so distant that it is confirmed that their orbits cannot be explained by perturbations from the giant planets,[14] nor by interaction with the galactic tides.[15] However, a passing star could have moved them on their orbit.[16]

Physical characteristics

[edit]
Looking back at Pluto, the largest visited KBO so far

Given the apparent magnitude (>20) of all but the biggest trans-Neptunian objects, the physical studies are limited to the following:

Studying colours and spectra provides insight into the objects' origin and a potential correlation with other classes of objects, namely centaurs and some satellites of giant planets (Triton, Phoebe), suspected to originate in the Kuiper belt. However, the interpretations are typically ambiguous as the spectra can fit more than one model of the surface composition and depend on the unknown particle size. More significantly, the optical surfaces of small bodies are subject to modification by intense radiation, solar wind and micrometeorites. Consequently, the thin optical surface layer could be quite different from the regolith underneath, and not representative of the bulk composition of the body.

Small TNOs are thought to be low-density mixtures of rock and ice with some organic (carbon-containing) surface material such as tholins, detected in their spectra. On the other hand, the high density of Haumea, 2.6–3.3 g/cm3, suggests a very high non-ice content (compare with Pluto's density: 1.86 g/cm3). The composition of some small TNOs could be similar to that of comets. Indeed, some centaurs undergo seasonal changes when they approach the Sun, making the boundary blurred (see 2060 Chiron and 7968 Elst–Pizarro). However, population comparisons between centaurs and TNOs are still controversial.[17]

Color indices

[edit]
See also: Asteroid color indices
Colors of trans-Neptunian objects. Yellow names in brackets are non trans-Neptunian objects added for reference. Mars and Triton are also not to scale.
Comparison of sizes, albedo, and colors of various large trans-Neptunian objects with sizes of >700 km. The dark colored arcs represent uncertainties of the object's size.

Colour indices are simple measures of the differences in the apparent magnitude of an object seen through blue (B), visible (V), i.e. green-yellow, and red (R) filters. The diagram illustrates known colour indices for all but the biggest objects (in slightly enhanced colour).[18] For reference, two moons, Triton and Phoebe, the centaur Pholus and the planet Mars are plotted (yellow labels, size not to scale). Correlations between the colours and the orbital characteristics have been studied, to confirm theories of different origin of the different dynamic classes:

  • Classical Kuiper belt object (cubewano) seem to be composed of two different colour populations: the so-called cold (inclination <5°) population, displaying only red colours, and the so-called hot (higher inclination) population displaying the whole range of colours from blue to very red.[19] A recent analysis based on the data from Deep Ecliptic Survey confirms this difference in colour between low-inclination (named Core) and high-inclination (named Halo) objects. Red colours of the Core objects together with their unperturbed orbits suggest that these objects could be a relic of the original population of the belt.[20]
  • Scattered disc objects show colour resemblances with hot classical objects pointing to a common origin.

While the relatively dimmer bodies, as well as the population as the whole, are reddish (V−I = 0.3–0.6), the bigger objects are often more neutral in colour (infrared index V−I < 0.2). This distinction leads to suggestion that the surface of the largest bodies is covered with ices, hiding the redder, darker areas underneath.[21]

Mean-color indices of dynamical groups in the outer Solar System [22]: 35 
Color Plutinos Cubewanos Centaurs SDOs Comets Jupiter trojans
B–V 0.895±0.190 0.973±0.174 0.886±0.213 0.875±0.159 0.795±0.035 0.777±0.091
V–R 0.568±0.106 0.622±0.126 0.573±0.127 0.553±0.132 0.441±0.122 0.445±0.048
V–I 1.095±0.201 1.181±0.237 1.104±0.245 1.070±0.220 0.935±0.141 0.861±0.090
R–I 0.536±0.135 0.586±0.148 0.548±0.150 0.517±0.102 0.451±0.059 0.416±0.057

Spectral type

[edit]
See also: Asteroid spectral types

Among TNOs, as among centaurs, there is a wide range of colors from blue-grey (neutral) to very red, but unlike the centaurs, bimodally grouped into grey and red centaurs, the distribution for TNOs appears to be uniform.[17] The wide range of spectra differ in reflectivity in visible red and near infrared. Neutral objects present a flat spectrum, reflecting as much red and infrared as visible spectrum.[23] Very red objects present a steep slope, reflecting much more in red and infrared. A recent attempt at classification (common with centaurs) uses the total of four classes from BB (blue, or neutral color, average B−V = 0.70, V−R = 0.39, e.g. Orcus) to RR (very red, B−V = 1.08, V−R = 0.71, e.g. Sedna) with BR and IR as intermediate classes. BR (intermediate blue-red) and IR (moderately red) differ mostly in the infrared bands I, J and H.

Typical models of the surface include water ice, amorphous carbon, silicates and organic macromolecules, named tholins, created by intense radiation. Four major tholins are used to fit the reddening slope:

  • Titan tholin, believed to be produced from a mixture of 90% N2 (nitrogen) and 10% CH4 (methane)
  • Triton tholin, as above but with very low (0.1%) methane content
  • (ethane) Ice tholin I, believed to be produced from a mixture of 86% H2O and 14% C2H6 (ethane)
  • (methanol) Ice tholin II, 80% H2O, 16% CH3OH (methanol) and 3% CO2

As an illustration of the two extreme classes BB and RR, the following compositions have been suggested

  • for Sedna (RR very red): 24% Triton tholin, 7% carbon, 10% N2, 26% methanol, and 33% methane
  • for Orcus (BB, grey/blue): 85% amorphous carbon, +4% Titan tholin, and 11% H2O ice

Size determination and distribution

[edit]
Size comparison between the Moon, Neptune's moon Triton, Pluto, several large TNOs, and the dwarf planet Ceres. Their respective shapes are not represented.

Characteristically, big (bright) objects are typically on inclined orbits, whereas the invariable plane regroups mostly small and dim objects.[21]

It is difficult to estimate the diameter of TNOs. For very large objects, with very well known orbital elements (like Pluto), diameters can be precisely measured by occultation of stars. For other large TNOs, diameters can be estimated by thermal measurements. The intensity of light illuminating the object is known (from its distance to the Sun), and one assumes that most of its surface is in thermal equilibrium (usually not a bad assumption for an airless body). For a known albedo, it is possible to estimate the surface temperature, and correspondingly the intensity of heat radiation. Further, if the size of the object is known, it is possible to predict both the amount of visible light and emitted heat radiation reaching Earth. A simplifying factor is that the Sun emits almost all of its energy in visible light and at nearby frequencies, while at the cold temperatures of TNOs, the heat radiation is emitted at completely different wavelengths (the far infrared).

Thus there are two unknowns (albedo and size), which can be determined by two independent measurements (of the amount of reflected light and emitted infrared heat radiation). TNOs are so far from the Sun that they are very cold, hence producing black-body radiation around 60 micrometres in wavelength. This wavelength of light is impossible to observe on the Earth's surface, but only from space using, e.g. the Spitzer Space Telescope. For ground-based observations, astronomers observe the tail of the black-body radiation in the far infrared. This far infrared radiation is so dim that the thermal method is only applicable to the largest KBOs. For the majority of (small) objects, the diameter is estimated by assuming an albedo. However, the albedos found range from 0.50 down to 0.05, resulting in a size range of 1,200–3,700 km for an object of magnitude of 1.0.[24]

Notable objects

[edit]
For a more comprehensive list, see List of trans-Neptunian objects and List of unnumbered trans-Neptunian objects.
Object Description
134340 Pluto a dwarf planet, the first TNO discovered, and largest-known TNO. It is the only TNO known to have an atmosphere. Hosts a system of five satellites and is the prototype plutino
15760 Albion the prototype cubewano, the first Kuiper belt object discovered after Pluto
(385185) 1993 RO the next plutino discovered after Pluto
(15874) 1996 TL66 the first object to be identified as a scattered disc object
1998 WW31 the first binary Kuiper belt object discovered after Pluto
47171 Lempo a plutino and triple system consisting of a central binary pair of similar size, and a third outer circumbinary satellite
20000 Varuna a large cubewano, known for its rapid rotation (6.3 h) and elongated shape
28978 Ixion a large plutino, was considered to be among the largest Kuiper belt objects upon discovery
50000 Quaoar a dwarf planet and a large cubewano. It has an elongated shape, albeit less elongated than Haumea. Has one known moon, Weywot, and two known rings that are both far beyond the Roche limit
90377 Sedna a distant dwarf planet, proposed for a new category named extended scattered disc (E-SDO),[25] detached objects,[26] distant detached objects (DDO)[27] or scattered-extended in the formal classification by DES.[13]
90482 Orcus a dwarf planet and the second-largest known plutino, after Pluto. Has a relatively large satellite.
136108 Haumea a dwarf planet, the third-largest-known trans-Neptunian object. Notable for its two known satellites, rings, and unusually short rotation period (3.9 h). It is the most massive known member of the Haumea collisional family.[28][29]
136472 Makemake a dwarf planet, a cubewano, and the fourth-largest known trans-Neptunian object[30]
136199 Eris a dwarf planet, a scattered disc object, and currently the most massive known trans-Neptunian object. It has one known satellite, Dysnomia
(612911) 2004 XR190 "Buffy" a scattered disc object following a highly inclined but nearly circular orbit
225088 Gonggong a dwarf planet and the second-largest discovered scattered-disc object. Has one known satellite, Xiangliu
(528219) 2008 KV42 "Drac" the first retrograde TNO, having an orbital inclination of i = 104°
(471325) 2011 KT19 "Niku" a TNO having an unusually high orbital inclination of 110°.[31] nicknamed Niku (逆骨), which means "rebellious" in the Chinese language.
2012 VP113 "Biden" a sednoid with a large perihelion of 80 AU from the Sun (50 AU beyond Neptune). nicknamed after Joe Biden due to the letters in its designation (VP). Joe Biden was Vice President ("VP") of the United States at the time of its discovery.
486958 Arrokoth contact binary cubewano encountered by the New Horizons spacecraft in 2019
2018 VG18 "Farout" the first trans-Neptunian object discovered while beyond 100 AU (15 billion km) from the Sun
2018 AG37 "FarFarOut" most distant observable trans-Neptunian object at 132 AU (19.7 billion km) from the Sun
2014 UZ224 "DeeDee" nicknamed DeeDee (DD) for "Distant Dwarf", referencing its current distance from the sun. a possible dwarf planet candidate located within Kuiper Belt

Exploration

[edit]
Kuiper belt object 486958 Arrokoth, in images taken by the New Horizons spacecraft

The only mission to date that primarily targeted a trans-Neptunian object was NASA's New Horizons, which was launched in January 2006 and flew by the Pluto system in July 2015[32] and 486958 Arrokoth in January 2019.[33]

In 2011, a design study explored a spacecraft survey of Quaoar, Sedna, Makemake, Haumea, and Eris.[34]

In 2019 one mission to TNOs included designs for orbital capture and multi-target scenarios.[35][36]

Some TNOs that were studied in a design study paper were 2002 UX25, 1998 WW31, and Lempo.[36]

The existence of planets beyond Neptune, ranging from less than an Earth mass (Sub-Earth) up to a brown dwarf has been often postulated[37][38] for different theoretical reasons to explain several observed or speculated features of the Kuiper belt and the Oort cloud. It was recently proposed to use ranging data from the New Horizons spacecraft to constrain the position of such a hypothesized body.[39]

NASA has been working towards a dedicated Interstellar Precursor in the 21st century, one intentionally designed to reach the interstellar medium, and as part of this the flyby of objects like Sedna are also considered.[40] Overall this type of spacecraft studies have proposed a launch in the 2020s, and would try to go a little faster than the Voyagers using existing technology.[40] One 2018 design study for an Interstellar Precursor, included a visit of minor planet 50000 Quaoar, in the 2030s.[41]

Extreme trans-Neptunian objects

[edit]
Overview of trans-Neptunian objects with extreme TNOs grouped into three categories at the top.
Sedna's orbit takes it far beyond even the Kuiper belt (30–50 AU), out to nearly 1,000 AU (Sun–Earth distance)
Main article: Extreme trans-Neptunian object

Among the extreme trans-Neptunian objects are three high-perihelion objects classified as sednoids: 90377 Sedna, 2012 VP113, and 541132 Leleākūhonua. They are distant detached objects with perihelia greater than 70 au. Their high perihelia keep them at a sufficient distance to avoid significant gravitational perturbations from Neptune. Previous explanations for the high perihelion of Sedna include a close encounter with an unknown planet on a distant orbit and a distant encounter with a random star or a member of the Sun's birth cluster that passed near the Solar System.[42][43][44]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ a b The literature is inconsistent in the use of the phrases "scattered disc" and "Kuiper belt". For some, they are distinct populations; for others, the scattered disk is part of the Kuiper belt, in which case the low-eccentricity population is called the "classical Kuiper belt". Authors may even switch between these two uses in a single publication.[2]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Transneptunian object 1994 TG2".
  2. ^ McFadden, Weissman, & Johnson (2005). Encyclopedia of the Solar System, footnote p. 584
  3. ^ "List Of Transneptunian Objects". Minor Planet Center. Retrieved 23 October 2018.
  4. ^ "List Of Centaurs and Scattered-Disk Objects". Minor Planet Center. 8 October 2018. Retrieved 23 October 2018.
  5. ^ "List of Known Trans-Neptunian Objects". Johnston's Archive. 7 October 2018. Retrieved 23 October 2018.
  6. ^ "JPL Small-Body Database Search Engine: orbital class (TNO)". JPL Solar System Dynamics. Retrieved 10 July 2014.
  7. ^ "JPL Small-Body Database Search Engine: orbital class (TNO) and q > 30.1 (au)". Retrieved 11 July 2014.
  8. ^ C. de la Fuente Marcos; R. de la Fuente Marcos (1 September 2014). "Extreme trans-Neptunian objects and the Kozai mechanism: signalling the presence of trans-Plutonian planets". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 443 (1): L59 – L63. arXiv:1406.0715. Bibcode:2014MNRAS.443L..59D. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slu084.
  9. ^ Chris Gebhardt; Jeff Goldader (20 August 2011). "Thirty-four years after launch, Voyager 2 continues to explore". NASASpaceflight.
  10. ^ Cory Shankman; et al. (10 February 2013). "A Possible Divot in the Size Distribution of the Kuiper Belt's Scattering Objects". Astrophysical Journal Letters. 764 (1): L2. arXiv:1210.4827. Bibcode:2013ApJ...764L...2S. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/764/1/L2. S2CID 118644497.
  11. ^ Shankman, C.; Kavelaars, J. J.; Gladman, B. J.; Alexandersen, M.; Kaib, N.; Petit, J.-M.; Bannister, M. T.; Chen, Y.-T.; Gwyn, S.; Jakubik, M.; Volk, K. (2016). "OSSOS. II. A Sharp Transition in the Absolute Magnitude Distribution of the Kuiper Belt's Scattering Population". The Astronomical Journal. 150 (2): 31. arXiv:1511.02896. Bibcode:2016AJ....151...31S. doi:10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/31. S2CID 55213074.
  12. ^ Brett Gladman; et al. (2008). The Solar System Beyond Neptune. p. 43.
  13. ^ a b Elliot, J. L.; Kern, S. D.; Clancy, K. B.; Gulbis, A. A. S.; Millis, R. L.; Buie, M. W.; Wasserman, L. H.; Chiang, E. I.; Jordan, A. B.; Trilling, D. E.; Meech, K. J. (2005). "The Deep Ecliptic Survey: A Search for Kuiper Belt Objects and Centaurs. II. Dynamical Classification, the Kuiper Belt Plane, and the Core Population". The Astronomical Journal. 129 (2): 1117–1162. Bibcode:2005AJ....129.1117E. doi:10.1086/427395.
  14. ^ Brown, Michael E.; Trujillo, Chadwick A.; Rabinowitz, David L. (2004). "Discovery of a Candidate Inner Oort Cloud Planetoid" (PDF). Astrophysical Journal. 617 (1): 645–649. arXiv:astro-ph/0404456. Bibcode:2004ApJ...617..645B. doi:10.1086/422095. S2CID 7738201. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 June 2006. Retrieved 2 April 2008.
  15. ^ Trujillo, Chadwick A.; Sheppard, Scott S. (2014). "A Sedna-like body with a perihelion of 80 astronomical units" (PDF). Nature. 507 (7493): 471–474. Bibcode:2014Natur.507..471T. doi:10.1038/nature13156. PMID 24670765. S2CID 4393431. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 December 2014.
  16. ^ Pfalzner, Susanne; Govind, Amith; Portegies Zwart, Simon (4 September 2024). "Trajectory of the stellar flyby that shaped the outer Solar System". Nature Astronomy. 8 (11): 1380–1386. arXiv:2409.03342. Bibcode:2024NatAs...8.1380P. doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02349-x. ISSN 2397-3366.
  17. ^ a b Peixinho, N.; Doressoundiram, A.; Delsanti, A.; Boehnhardt, H.; Barucci, M. A.; Belskaya, I. (2003). "Reopening the TNOs Color Controversy: Centaurs Bimodality and TNOs Unimodality". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 410 (3): L29 – L32. arXiv:astro-ph/0309428. Bibcode:2003A&A...410L..29P. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031420. S2CID 8515984.
  18. ^ Hainaut, O. R.; Delsanti, A. C. (2002). "Color of Minor Bodies in the Outer Solar System". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 389 (2): 641–664. Bibcode:2002A&A...389..641H. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020431. datasource
  19. ^ Doressoundiram, A.; Peixinho, N.; de Bergh, C.; Fornasier, S.; Thébault, Ph.; Barucci, M. A.; Veillet, C. (2002). "The color distribution in the Edgeworth-Kuiper Belt". The Astronomical Journal. 124 (4): 2279–2296. arXiv:astro-ph/0206468. Bibcode:2002AJ....124.2279D. doi:10.1086/342447. S2CID 30565926.
  20. ^ Gulbis, Amanda A. S.; Elliot, J. L.; Kane, Julia F. (2006). "The color of the Kuiper belt Core". Icarus. 183 (1): 168–178. Bibcode:2006Icar..183..168G. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2006.01.021.
  21. ^ a b Rabinowitz, David L.; Barkume, K. M.; Brown, Michael E.; Roe, H. G.; Schwartz, M.; Tourtellotte, S. W.; Trujillo, C. A. (2006). "Photometric Observations Constraining the Size, Shape, and Albedo of 2003 El61, a Rapidly Rotating, Pluto-Sized Object in the Kuiper Belt". Astrophysical Journal. 639 (2): 1238–1251. arXiv:astro-ph/0509401. Bibcode:2006ApJ...639.1238R. doi:10.1086/499575. S2CID 11484750.
  22. ^ Fornasier, S.; Dotto, E.; Hainaut, O.; Marzari, F.; Boehnhardt, H.; De Luise, F.; et al. (October 2007). "Visible spectroscopic and photometric survey of Jupiter Trojans: Final results on dynamical families". Icarus. 190 (2): 622–642. arXiv:0704.0350. Bibcode:2007Icar..190..622F. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2007.03.033. S2CID 12844258.
  23. ^ A. Barucci Trans Neptunian Objects’ surface properties, IAU Symposium No. 229, Asteroids, Comets, Meteors, Aug 2005, Rio de Janeiro
  24. ^ "Conversion of Absolute Magnitude to Diameter". Minorplanetcenter.org. Retrieved 7 October 2013.
  25. ^ "Evidence for an Extended Scattered Disk?". obs-nice.fr.
  26. ^ Jewitt, D.; Delsanti, A. (2006). "The Solar System Beyond The Planets" (PDF). Solar System Update : Topical and Timely Reviews in Solar System Sciences (Springer-Praxis ed.). Springer. ISBN 978-3-540-26056-1.
  27. ^ Gomes, Rodney S.; Matese, John J.; Lissauer, Jack J. (2006). "A Distant Planetary-Mass Solar Companion May Have Produced Distant Detached Objects" (PDF). Icarus. 184 (2): 589–601. Bibcode:2006Icar..184..589G. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2006.05.026. Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 January 2007.
  28. ^ Brown, Michael E.; Barkume, Kristina M.; Ragozzine, Darin; Schaller, Emily L. (2007). "A collisional family of icy objects in the Kuiper belt" (PDF). Nature. 446 (7133): 294–296. Bibcode:2007Natur.446..294B. doi:10.1038/nature05619. PMID 17361177. S2CID 4430027.
  29. ^ de la Fuente Marcos, Carlos; de la Fuente Marcos, Raúl (11 February 2018). "Dynamically correlated minor bodies in the outer Solar system". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 474 (1): 838–846. arXiv:1710.07610. Bibcode:2018MNRAS.474..838D. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2765.
  30. ^ "MPEC 2005-O42 : 2005 FY9". Minorplanetcenter.org. Retrieved 7 October 2013.
  31. ^ "Mystery object in weird orbit beyond Neptune cannot be explained". New Scientist. 10 August 2016. Retrieved 11 August 2016.
  32. ^ "NASA New Horizons Mission Page". 25 March 2015.
  33. ^ "New Horizons: News Article?page=20190101". pluto.jhuapl.edu. Retrieved 1 January 2019.
  34. ^ "A Survey of Mission Opportunities to Trans-Neptunian Objects". ResearchGate. Retrieved 23 September 2019.
  35. ^ Low-Cost Opportunity for Multiple Trans-Neptunian Object Rendezvous and Capture, AAS Paper 17-777.
  36. ^ a b "AAS 17-777 LOW-COST OPPORTUNITY FOR MULTIPLE TRANS-NEPTUNIAN OBJECT RENDEZVOUS AND ORBITAL CAPTURE". ResearchGate. Retrieved 23 September 2019.
  37. ^ Julio A., Fernández (January 2011). "On the Existence of a Distant Solar Companion and its Possible Effects on the Oort Cloud and the Observed Comet Population". The Astrophysical Journal. 726 (1): 33. Bibcode:2011ApJ...726...33F. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/726/1/33. S2CID 121392983.
  38. ^ Patryk S., Lykawka; Tadashi, Mukai (April 2008). "An Outer Planet Beyond Pluto and the Origin of the Trans-Neptunian Belt Architecture". The Astronomical Journal. 135 (4): 1161–1200. arXiv:0712.2198. Bibcode:2008AJ....135.1161L. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/135/4/1161. S2CID 118414447.
  39. ^ Lorenzo, Iorio (August 2013). "Perspectives on effectively constraining the location of a massive trans-Plutonian object with the New Horizons spacecraft: a sensitivity analysis". Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy. 116 (4): 357–366. arXiv:1301.3831. Bibcode:2013CeMDA.116..357I. doi:10.1007/s10569-013-9491-x. S2CID 119219926.
  40. ^ a b Spaceflight, Leonard David 2019-01-09T11:57:34Z (9 January 2019). "A Wild 'Interstellar Probe' Mission Idea Is Gaining Momentum". Space.com. Retrieved 23 September 2019.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  41. ^ Bradnt, P.C.; et al. "The Interstellar Probe Mission (Graphic Poster)" (PDF). hou.usra.edu. Retrieved 13 October 2019.
  42. ^ Wall, Mike (24 August 2011). "A Conversation With Pluto's Killer: Q & A With Astronomer Mike Brown". Space.com. Retrieved 7 February 2016.
  43. ^ Brown, Michael E.; Trujillo, Chadwick; Rabinowitz, David (2004). "Discovery of a Candidate Inner Oort Cloud Planetoid". The Astrophysical Journal. 617 (1): 645–649. arXiv:astro-ph/0404456. Bibcode:2004ApJ...617..645B. doi:10.1086/422095. S2CID 7738201.
  44. ^ Brown, Michael E. (28 October 2010). "There's something out there – part 2". Mike Brown's Planets. Retrieved 18 July 2016.
[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Trans-Neptunian objects.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trans-Neptunian_object&oldid=1261382073"